diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/ChangeLog | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/gawk.texi | 10 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/gawktexi.in | 10 |
3 files changed, 6 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/doc/ChangeLog b/doc/ChangeLog index 7c3ddbe5..d1a41bae 100644 --- a/doc/ChangeLog +++ b/doc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2014-09-08 Arnold D. Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com> + + * gawktexi.in: Remove text that won't get used. + 2014-09-07 Arnold D. Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com> * gawktexi.in: Minor cleanups. diff --git a/doc/gawk.texi b/doc/gawk.texi index 223e90a1..177d8c89 100644 --- a/doc/gawk.texi +++ b/doc/gawk.texi @@ -21131,15 +21131,7 @@ function readfile(file, tmp, contents) This function reads from @code{file} one record at a time, building up the full contents of the file in the local variable @code{contents}. -It works, but is not necessarily -@c 8/2014. Thanks to BWK for pointing this out: -efficient. -@ignore -@footnote{Execution time grows quadratically in the size of -the input; for each record, @command{awk} has to allocate a bigger -internal buffer for @code{contents}, copy the old contents into it, -and then append the contents of the new record.} -@end ignore +It works, but is not necessarily efficient. The following function, based on a suggestion by Denis Shirokov, reads the entire contents of the named file in one shot: diff --git a/doc/gawktexi.in b/doc/gawktexi.in index af84994c..2af398c0 100644 --- a/doc/gawktexi.in +++ b/doc/gawktexi.in @@ -20258,15 +20258,7 @@ function readfile(file, tmp, contents) This function reads from @code{file} one record at a time, building up the full contents of the file in the local variable @code{contents}. -It works, but is not necessarily -@c 8/2014. Thanks to BWK for pointing this out: -efficient. -@ignore -@footnote{Execution time grows quadratically in the size of -the input; for each record, @command{awk} has to allocate a bigger -internal buffer for @code{contents}, copy the old contents into it, -and then append the contents of the new record.} -@end ignore +It works, but is not necessarily efficient. The following function, based on a suggestion by Denis Shirokov, reads the entire contents of the named file in one shot: |